header-image

Eleven Artists from Everywhere

DISCUSSED

Tim Gardner, Yu Hong, Natacha Merritt, Jill Musnicki Claudette Schreuder, Chie Shimizu, Rebecca Tillett, Helen Verhoeven, Anahita Vossoughi, Cynthia Westwood, Liu Xiaodong

by Eric Fischl
Tim Gardner, Untitled (Family Portrait #2), 2004–2005. Pastel on gessoed paper mounted on canvas, 49" x 37 5⁄8".

Eleven Artists from Everywhere

Eric Fischl
Facebook icon Share via Facebook Twitter icon Share via Twitter

There are two kinds of artist: One kind infuses his or her artwork with energy and gesture and spontaneity, the other with detail and memory. The work of the first kind of artist I find consuming and satisfying, but the aftereffects fade all too quickly into general impressions. The second kind of artist seeks in the frozen moment a unique, summary image that be­comes, for me, unforgettable in its specifics. As great a painter as Jackson Pollock was, I can’t recall with precision any one of his paintings; yes, I can talk about drips and reduced palette and the canvas’s size and energy, but these are features that apply to much of Pollock’s work. By contrast, I remember every Edward Hopper painting I’ve ever seen, with great clarity.

Helen Verhoeven, Three Men, 2004. Oil on canvas, 39 3⁄8″ x 55 1⁄8″. Courtesy of the artist and Wallspace Gallery, New York.

The young artists I have chosen for this issue of the Believer are mainly members of this second group of art makers. I saw their work, and I remembered it lucidly as if the images were burned on my brain. Maybe it is no coincidence that many of these artists work from photographs (with the possible exception of Claudette Schreuder). Cynthia Westwood paints predominantly from life, but she uses photos as well. David Hockney suggested in his controversial book Secret Knowledge that even the old masters used an optic device called a ca­mera obscura to achieve their lifelike effects, and I’m with him. I have al­ways used photos to make my work, and I don’t un­derstand the bias people have against painters and sculptors using photos. The photograph is a great tool for the painter, and I’ll tell you why. First, the photo shows us stuff we didn’t see at the instant we pushed the button, even though we witnessed the image firsthand through the lens. When you cut a moment into a fraction of a second, nothing is still. A photo captures people off balance and unself-conscious, and for me that is when truth lies ex­posed.

Cynthia Westwood, White Bath #2, 2004. Oil on linen, 26″ x 36″. Courtesy of the artist.

Every artist must ask, “How much is enough?” How much description, how much paint, how much light or color, is enough to create a powerful and memorable experience? For artists dealing with representation, the photo suggests how much detail they need to make their representations “believable.” That’s what I like—believable representation. Magic occurs when an inanimate object talks back to you. We want to feel that the object is, for a moment, more alive than we are. During the Renaissance, the highest form...

You have reached your article limit

Sign up for a digital subscription and continue reading all new issues, plus our entire archives, for just $1.50/month.

More Reads
Essays

The Human Fence

Ben Ehrenriech
Essays

Other People’s Bookmarks: Fellow Wanderers of a Forgotten Republic

Michael Atkinson
Essays

The Land of Macho Literature

Milana Vuković Runjić
More