header-image

Your Face Tomorrow: Volume Three

Central question: To what extent are we responsible for what we say and hear?

Your Face Tomorrow: Volume Three

Megan Doll
Facebook icon Share via Facebook Twitter icon Share via Twitter

At last, after three years of suspense, we are given the conclusion to Spanish novelist Javier Marías’s ambitious and sublimely executed three-part spy novel Your Face Tomorrow. The first installment, Fever and Spear, introduces the curious situation of the narrator, Jacques Deza. Estranged from his wife, Luisa, and their children in Madrid, Deza is recruited for his extraordinary powers of perception into a mysterious branch of Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service to be an “interpreter of lives,” an agent who creates elaborate character sketches of his assigned subjects. The second book, Dance and Dream, constructed around one bizarre night in a London nightclub, reveals the darker side of Deza’s boss and the nameless organization for which he works. In Poison, Shadow and Farewell, the narrator himself comes into sharper focus, as he returns to Madrid to surveil his family and eventually takes ruthless action to defend it.

Like most of Marías’s works, Your Face Tomorrow deals with the process of discovery and the burden of knowing. It explores the transactional nature of conversation, which creates creditors, debtors, and embroilment as characters provide each other with information both wanted and unwanted. “Telling is almost always done as a gift, even when the story contains and injects some poison,” Marías writes in Fever and Spear. To underscore this point, he strews reproductions of early twentieth-century “careless talk” campaign posters throughout the trilogy.

The title of the trilogy, taken from Shakespeare’s Henry IV, refers to the future, unknowable faces of those who surround us and may one day betray us. When Luisa’s lover, Custardoy, suggests previously unrevealed facets of Luisa’s personality, Deza is profoundly unsettled:

It’s dreadful to be told anything, anything at all, it’s dreadful to have ideas put in your head, however unlikely or ridiculous and however unsustainable and improbable (because everything has its time to be believed)… it’s understandable really that people should hate knowledge and deny what is there before their eyes and prefer to know nothing and repudiate the facts, that they should avoid the inoculation and the poison and push it away as soon as they see or feel it near, it’s best not to take risks; it’s understandable, too, that we almost all ignore what we see and divine and anticipate and smell, and that we toss into the bag of imaginings anything that we see...

You have reached your article limit

Sign up for a digital subscription and continue reading all new issues, plus our entire archives, for just $1.50/month.

More Reads
Reviews

Op Oloop

Jessica Loudis
Reviews

Virgil and the Mountain Cat

Dominic Luxford
Reviews

A Jello Horse

Jim Ruland
More