header-image

My Vocabulary did this to me: Collected Poetry of Jack Spicer

Central question: Can a dead poet transmit real objects and real emotions across time through language? 

My Vocabulary did this to me: Collected Poetry of Jack Spicer

Travis Nichols
Facebook icon Share via Facebook Twitter icon Share via Twitter

This is the collected scar tissue of Jack Spicer, traces of what his vocabulary did, and continues to do, to writers fool enough to become poets. Himself included.

You won’t find any easy platitudes here, no sigh-inducing aphorisms to be showcased on public transportation—the book is a heartbreaker, and not just because its author died young and drunk in the poverty ward of San Francisco General Hospital.

Spicer championed poetry as the alpha and omega of human existence—a kind of kabalistic code capable of generating great power. At the same time, Spicer brushed poetry aside as a fool’s errand. “No one listens to poetry,” he wrote in his 1962 poem “Language,” and while that fact no doubt wounded him, he didn’t write the line as a lament. For Spicer, the poet’s job was not to cultivate a wide audience but to create a world. And like any good metaphysician, he knew the real of the world went beyond the currency of the everyday.

“Words are what sticks to the real,” he wrote in After Lorca. “We use them to push the real, to drag the real into the poem. They are what we hold on with, nothing else.”

William S. Burroughs said that language was a virus from outer space, and Spicer would surely have agreed. Trained as a linguist and immersed in the occult, Spicer saw language— especially the language of poetry—as a transmission from outside. Words stuck to the real, and the real zapped in from another world. He railed against what he called the “big lie of the personal” in poetry. The power—and the point—lay outside most people’s comprehension, often including the poet’s. According to Spicer, the poet must surrender his or her will to communicate in order to become a vessel for the muse. Or, as he liked to say, the Martians. Not a bad philosophy for a disagreeable man dedicated to an esoteric practice. If you’re going to be obscure, he said, you might as well be a “free fucking agent” unbeholden to fame or academia.

A fiercely local and iconoclastic writer— Spicer refused to have his work copyrighted, or, after 1960, published outside of what he called the Pacific Republic of California—he died at forty, having ruptured his liver and lapsed into an alcoholic coma, to no one’s real surprise. He had recently given a series of lectures in Vancouver in which he articulated his idea that true poetry was dictated by outside forces—the Martians—and he was drunk and drunker in his last few months after losing yet another job. In the poverty ward, Spicer became momentarily lucid. He told his fellow poet and friend Robin Blaser, “My vocabulary did this to me. Your love will let you go on,” then fell back into incoherence and eventually death. Blaser pointedly notes in his essay “The Practice of Outside” that, with the effort of this pronouncement, Spicer “shat into the plastic bag they’d wrapped him in.”

The dichotomy is telling. Spicer was both a supremely romantic figure—a gay bohemian poet with mystical insight—and an earthly wretch—a filthy drunk whose astringent poetics alienated him from everyone. Similarly, you might expect a poet who listened so intently to Martians, dead souls, and the Muse to make nonsensical poetry of jibber- jabber, but Spicer’s poetry is brutally to the point, often beautiful, and spare. It’s just this type of system-jamming that makes his poetry and his biography, after decades of attentive parsing, still wonderfully alien.

Format: 504 pp., cloth; Size: 6″ x 8″; Price: $35.00; Publisher: Wesleyan University Press; Editors: Peter Gizzi & Kevin Killian; Print run: 3,000; Acquisitions editor: Suzanna Tamminen; Book design: Katherine Kimball; Typeface: Dante; Representative passage: “I want to make poems out of real objects. The lemon to be a lemon that the reader could cut or squeeze or taste—a real lemon like a newspaper in a collage is a real newspaper. I would like the moon in my poems to be a real moon, one which could be suddenly covered with a cloud that has nothing to do with the poem.”
Travis Nichols
More Reads
Reviews

Norman Lock’s Grim Tales

Blake Butler
Reviews

Takashi Hiraide’s For the Fighting Spirit of the Walnut

Alan Gilbert
Reviews

David Ohle’s The Pisstown Chaos

Benjamin Strong
More