header-image

A Review of Elevator in Sài Gòn

Jasmine Liu
Facebook icon Share via Facebook Twitter icon Share via Twitter

How to make sense of your mother’s life when she dies after falling several flights from the top floor of her son’s, your brother’s, defective home elevator? This absurd incident, which opens Thuận’s Elevator in Sài Gòn, occasions the narrator’s return from Paris, where she has lived in exile for fifteen years. At the funeral in Sài Gòn, her brother has arranged for their mother’s portrait to be placed side by side with their father’s, but she finds the suggestion of them reuniting in death implausible, and fails to recall any “family scene” from her past. Instead of summoning fuzzy memories from her childhood, she spends the funeral musing on how her mother has managed to keep her face intact while her body has become unrecognizable. She calls her brother the “producer-cum-director” of their mother’s funeral-cum-movie, and credits their mother for her excellence in playing the part.

Back in France, she embarks on a quest to track down a certain Paul Polotsky, who appears with her mother in a mysterious old photograph, and might have been her mother’s
lover. She deduces that her mother, a loyal Việt Minh apparatchik, would have met him while under interrogation in a Hà Nội prison. The narrator is dogged about following Polotsky, and meets a bizarre cast of characters along the way.

She seems comfortable being a voyeur. Much like the narrator of Thuận’s Anglophone debut, Chinatown (2022), she often finds herself carried away by flights of fancy, so much so that it can be hard to tell what information she’s gleaning from her interlocutors and what she’s making up. On matters of love, she has a penchant for imagining melodramatic, grandiloquent narrative arcs. Watching Polotsky shop with his wife from afar, she imagines “a romance à la Stendhal,” though nothing about the scene invites the comparison. Some of her fantasies are still more hyperactive. She teaches a Vietnamese class, and imagines the circumstances behind one student’s prickliness: He must be getting a divorce. A divorce, specifically, from a wife wearing a light gray dress that shows off a “fleshy pair of thighs.” He was at court just this morning, she surmises, where he would have exclaimed to the judge: “I’m so done with that rule of yours, that once a man and a woman get married, they have to spend a lifetime together!” There is a vertiginous, far-sighted quality to the prose, owing...

You have reached your article limit

Sign up for a digital subscription and continue reading all new issues, plus our entire archives, for just $1.50/month.

More Reads
Reviews

A Review of Antiquity

Rosa Boshier González
Reviews

A Review of Pages of Mourning

Kristen Martin
Reviews

A Review of Crazy Like a Fox and Cloudland Revisited

Daniel Elkind
More